Contact Popular Mechanics and tell them The Veterans for 9/11 Truth are looking for them.


To: Popular Mechanics Writers of "Debunking 9/11 Myths"

My name is Matthew Naus and I'm a Co-founder of Veterans for 911 Truth. We currently have 235 members that don't believe 9/11 conspiracy theories are a myth. If your evidence, or facts as you call them, are so solid as to call 9/11 conspiracy theories a "myth" then you should have no problem debating members of Veterans for 9/11 Truth on the events surrounding 9/11/01.

We at Veterans for 911 Truth challenge you to a debate
of the information put out by: The 9/11 Commission Report, The 9/11 Investigations - Staff Reports Of The 9/11 Commission - Excerpts from the House-Senate Joint Inquiry Report on 9/11 - Testimony from 14 key witnesses, including Richard Clarke, George Tenet, and Condoleezza Rice, any of your magazine articles on debunking 9/11...

We are so sure of our research into the events surrounding 9/11 that we're challenging you to a debate without even reading your paperback book "Debunking 9/11 Myths". We want you to take us up on this challenge in a nationally televised debate. We will be anxiously waiting for you to answer "YES" if you have the guts to debate us.

Matthew Naus
Co-founder of: Veterans for 911 Truth
e-mail: nausmr@yahoo.com
Thanks to 911blogger.com for the heads up on this.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 comments

  1. ewing2001 // 12:57 AM  

    Loose Change, Wayne Barrett and the 9/11 Scholars are only
    covering half of the truth, which turns it into a limited hangout.
    Same to the Vanity Fair negligence hangout.

    The rest is documented here:
    http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com

    If anyone agrees please sign the following petition at:
    http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html

  2. The Artistic Macrophage // 1:33 PM  

    I agree, that an intelligent debate on the facts of 9/11 and the evidence, should occur. No issues this what so ever.

    The MIT engineers would be a good group to stand and argue toe to toe with S. Jones and J. Woods, don't you think?

    Not sure what Fetzer is an expert on, in terms of 9/11, that he should be in on it...maybe the "philosophy" of government cover-up or terroist attacks or something.

    griffin - what is he an expert on...well I guess he could bring up the "ommissions" in the 9/11 report one by one, and ask someone there for explanations.

  3. Stephen Eli Harris // 9:37 PM  

    Regardless, these people will never be willing to go toe to toe no matter how much Jones or the rest ask and/or demand it. It'll never happen.