When the families who lost lives on 9/11 are demanding answers, everyone should be listening. When the familes believe the Government is Complicit, people should be listening. I will never understand how these people are being ignored. It just doesn't make sense.

Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack
Tells radio host 9/11 Commission a sham, "cover-up beyond belief"

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | July 8 2006

The representative of the largest group of 9/11 families says that the official version of events is a fallacy and that the NORAD stand down and evidence of incendiary devices used to bring down the towers amount to government complicity in the attacks - a conclusion shared by half of the 9/11 families he represents.

Doyle heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families and lost his own son Joey in the collapse of the twin towers.

"If you want to believe what they want to snow you under on like the 9/11 Commission - that's a total fallacy," said Doyle.

"The continuing cover-up is beyond belief," Doyle told GCN radio host Alex Jones.

Doyle questioned why WTC steel that was withheld from NIST for examination for explosives was used instead to build a battleship.

"Isn't it amazing how they got it out of this country within days," said Doyle as he addressed the cover-up of the physical evidence from a crime scene.

Doyle said he had personally talked to six different individuals who were at the World Trade Center site and described incendiary devices before the collapse of the towers.

"It's documented proof that tower 7 was not hit by a plane yet it goes up in flames then the owner of the place Larry Silverstein himself ordered it to be pulled at 4 o'clock that afternoon and all of a sudden it exploded straight down."

"We have two planes fly into the towers and all of a sudden they get blown up within an hour and a half - that's impossible," said Doyle.

Doyle estimated that around half of the family members his organization represents think that there was government complicity in the attacks.

"It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way."

"Where was NORAD," asked Doyle as he highlighted the implausible gap between the known hijacking times of Flight 93 and Flight 77 and their eventual destruction.

"It was called a step-down - don't do anything - let it happen."

"From everything I look at I'm sure there was a lot of complicity - in the least there had to be a lot of complicity - if you read all the facts there's no way that nineteen hijackers carried out this mission," Doyle told Jones.

Doyle also spoke out on establishment charities withholding large portions of donations from 9/11 families and how 9/11 whistleblowers have been punished meanwhile individuals who facilitated the attacks were rewarded.

In addition to that article, again thanks to Paul Watson, I'd like to post this video of Donna Marsh O'Connor speaking at the rally for 9/11 Truth at the UN in New York on 9/11/2005. Donnna's daughter died on 9/11 in the 2nd Tower.





How can you ignore that? How?

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 comments

  1. The Artistic Macrophage // 4:53 PM  

    Nobody can ignore it. It is gut wrenching. She lost that which is most dear to her. If I lost a child, i would be as angry and upset, but I would hope that I would still require solid evidence to prove what happened. Now we could spend weeks argueing the evidence here, but that isnt the point. If enough americans demand their independent investigation, they will likely get it. However, all the known Conspiracy people or "Truth Seekers" will not be a part of that investigation, for the same reason the US govt shouldnt be. The reason...bias. The original commission was not set up to investigate the govt, so I still think it did a lot of good, for what its official mandate was. If a new investigation is to center around govt coverup or involvement, then no govt connection or "Truth" movement participation can occur, as both sides are BIAS.

  2. AdNihilo // 6:39 PM  

    Problem is my fellow canadians, unlike Canada, there's just too many 'thought dependent' muddled American minds so deluded by their faith-based thinking, they'll never be able to 'see' the 911 truth much less the GOP election fraud overthrowing our democracy. Unlike the vast numbers of ‘dependent thinkers’ living in the world’s most dangerous threat to world peace at the dawn of the 21st century, there is still only a small percentage of its citizens rational enough, inquisitive enough, and open minded enough to face this new ‘Former USA’ reality. Only a few million in the ‘Former US’ have honestly confronted the documented and proven facts head on and without any bias. It is a proven and documented factual reality that’s still repeatedly denied or ignored by 10s of millions in this once great nation’s populace too self-involved to care or still in some psychotic state of denial. The overwhelming majority of this once great nation’s population seem to be more concerned about phony TV ‘reality’ shows like American Idol than the actual reality slapping them in their collective faith-based face.

    It’s almost like arguing with a drunk or someone using drugs to ‘escape’ reality. It’s very difficult to convince them of what’s real and what’s not. When confronted with evidence against their faux reality, the muddled ‘dependent thinking’ minds of these huddled masses in America have become so dependent on the fallacies they’ve been spoon fed, they encounter an intense fear that their world view, or faux reality, will come crashing down around them. Which it must in order to cure their psychosis and exist more fully in a rational reality. It is the same foundation of fear used by religion that causes a complete rejection of factual evidence to the contrary. When the factual evidence is rejected, one acts against reality. Rejecting a fact-based rational reality is an act of self-destruction.

  3. The Artistic Macrophage // 9:53 PM  

    I agree with alot of what you said adnihilo, but the trouble now, is those who have taken up the cause of "inquiring" as to the whole truth about 9/11 have themselves now an agenda, and hence their lack of bias has been taken away. A true independent and FREE from bias investigation into 911 will be hard to come by, but I think one through the united nations would be a good suggestion, or one through the scientific community.