Well, most who are visiting this site probably already know that new footage was released yesterday regarding the attack on 9/11.

The only thing I can really say about it is this; People fought for over 4 years to have this one piece of evidence released (By the way, the FBI has admitted to having at least 84 pieces of video that captured the event) and you still can't even see a plane, let alone one of the 757 variety. See for yourself.

Video 1:

Video 2:

I really don't know what happened to the Pentagon and I will never believe a 757 hit it unless actually seeing it. The damage just doesn't add up to me. To me, it's far more believable that a military unmanned drone hit or at the very least a much smaller plane.

Today on Infowars.com, an article was posted regarding what a 757 would really look like in that footage. Now, I'm not agreeing that this is what it would look like but, it's far more realistic that anything I've seen to date.

Note: This is a doctored image of course. It's not real footage... but it does show how easily things are doctored...

Below are some related articles from infowars.com I definitely suggest reading the Psy-Op one as it's quite informative on what, perhaps, is trying to be achieved with the release of this useless video.

RELATED: Pentagon Video Is Giant Psy-Op

RELATED: Release Of Pentagon Images Direct Assault On 9/11 Truth Movement

RELATED: Charlie Sheen's Pentagon Questions Remain Unanswered

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Anonymous // 4:42 PM  

    I had seen that video over a year ago...there were some really great websites out there, that now have been taken down. Not by the authors either.

    ANyhoo...Amazing how now the government thinks this is proving anything on their behalf. Yea, only the fact that they had this evidence and are now being called on the carpet...Pffft on them!

    Nice try though..not buying it

  2. Stephen Eli Harris // 3:34 PM  

    There's still a lot of really great websites out there though, I do notice on the older ones that their sources (links) were taken offline. Interesting, me thinks.

    They have plenty more videos than this as well. It's just a matter of how long before they actually release them... if they do.

  3. Ricardo // 12:34 AM  

    As a citizen of the US I can tell you with with all honesty that our government isn't smart enough to pull off the conspiracy your exploring. They couldn't even mobilize rescue teams to save the Katrina victims. Actually they can't even screw in a light bulb. Either way, it's still interesting to ask these questions because you never know when they will succeed at pulling off something shady.

  4. Stephen Eli Harris // 2:31 AM  

    It is only elements of the US government that we are questioning, it is not it as an entirety and yes, these folks are very capable of pulling off these attacks.

    As for Katrina, one has to question; was it idiocity or intention that was reason for the failure to mobolize for the disaster?

  5. Ricardo // 10:15 PM  

    I regret to say the lack of immediate action on Katrina may have been racially and economically motivated. Had it been more affluent communities, they would have moved faster. I wish I were wrong but that's how it looked like to me.

    On 9/11, it wouldn't shock me to someday learn that some in the US government may have looked the other way to legitimize a war in the middle east. But for now I think it's still parts of the government unable to put 2 and 2 together. The lying about what happened is to cover up their their tracks and avoid incitements.

  6. Ricardo // 11:50 AM  

    Also the pentagon is a reinforced building in which even the glass is designed to withstand a blast. It was made that way to survive a war, so the building did it's job in light of this tragedy. There's a great article on Popular Mechanics that explains much of this and more.


  7. Ricardo // 11:52 AM  

    Okay, screw that link above, here it is.


  8. Stephen Eli Harris // 2:06 AM  

    It's quite possible that they are just covering up (badly) thier mistakes made on 9/11 which is exactly the reason why another investigation is needed. Because there is so much doubt and so many unanswered questions, this needs to be opened again.

    As for the popular mechanics article, I've read it. I just have a problem with it due to some of those who were consulting members for it. Plus, there are so many other educated people (who don't work for those who we are questiong) that say very different things than those who wrote that article.